What if I told you… the biggest threat to Indian democracy is not sitting in Parliament… but in black robes behind courtroom walls?
What if the Vice President of India, Jagdeep Dhankhar, just pulled the mask off a long-standing nexus between elite lawyers, corrupt judges, and political fixers?
And what if I told you… some of the loudest defenders of democracy are actually the ones hammering nails into its coffin?
This is not fiction. This is the raw truth of today’s India.
And this… is the story they don’t want you to hear.
Vice President’s Bombshell & the Panic in Legal Circles
Recently, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar gave a speech that sent shockwaves through the Lutyens ecosystem. A speech that made the backs of elite lawyers burn red with rage.
Why?
Because Dhankhar dared to speak what the common man whispers at tea stalls, what the youth scream on social media, and what the judiciary fears the most: Accountability.
Insiders believe Dhankhar didn’t act alone. In fact, it’s being speculated that some Supreme Court judges themselves nudged him forward—because they can’t speak, but the Vice President can.
And who was the first to cry foul?
Kapil Sibal. Abhishek Manu Singhvi. Prashant Bhushan.
The same trio that treats the Supreme Court like their personal playground.
The Hypocrisy of the Legal Elite
Let’s expose the double standards.
Singhvi says: “The Vice President should remain silent like the President.”
Sibal says: “The President is just a ceremonial figure.”
So what’s the truth? Should constitutional heads stay silent while the judiciary goes rogue?
For 60 years, Sibal’s Congress party treated the President like a rubber stamp. Now they want the Vice President to be mute too?
Sibal defends judicial interference by saying: “If the executive fails, the judiciary must act.”
Then tell us, Mr. Sibal—when the judiciary itself fails, who will act?
Will the gods descend? Or are we to accept that the judiciary is now above scrutiny?
The Judiciary’s Fall from Grace
Let’s talk about the elephant in the courtroom.
Justice Yashwant Verma’s case remains buried.
Lalu Yadav, sentenced to 32 years, is roaming free.
Kejriwal’s bail? 9 months and still no bench formation.
Ajit Bharti’s contempt case? Dead.
Kunal Kamra’s? Forgotten.
Tiesta Setalvad? Granted bail with red carpet welcome.
And all the while, Singhvi, Bhushan, and Sibal waltz into the Supreme Court like it’s a private club.
“Kundi mat khatkayo Raja, seedha andar aao Raja.”
The Supreme Court has turned into Bail Court… and Stay Court.
Not a temple of justice, but a fortress of privilege.
Sibal’s Flip-Flops & His Own Explosive Statements
Here’s the killer twist.
Kapil Sibal himself, on 8th August 2022, said:
“After 50 years of practice, I no longer expect justice from the Supreme Court.”
He admitted that “sensitive cases are assigned to select judges” and outcomes are known beforehand.
He accused the judiciary of favoritism, of ignoring ground realities, of allowing ED officers to raid citizens despite the Supreme Court’s privacy rulings.
He even questioned which lawyers meet which judges behind closed doors.
But today, he stands defending the same institution and attacking Dhankhar?
Why the sudden change of heart, Mr. Sibal?
Contempt Games & Selective Outrage
Now let’s talk about Nishikant Dubey.
For merely voicing public sentiment and questioning the judiciary, Dubey is now being threatened with a contempt case.
Anas Tanveer and Narendra Mishra ran to the Supreme Court like cheerleaders with a petition in hand.
Irony died that day.
Because when Prashant Bhushan made two filthy tweets about the Chief Justice, the punishment was a laughable 1 rupee fine.
And when Bhushan’s father, Shanti Bhushan, called 8 out of 16 former CJIs corrupt, no one batted an eyelid.
Where was the outrage then?
Where was the sacred contempt of court?
Selective morality is not justice. It’s mockery.
Dissent or Urban Naxalism?
Justice Chandrachud once said:
“Dissent is the safety valve of democracy.”
“Suppression of intellect is suppression of conscience.”
Yet today, the same judiciary wants to silence dissent if it comes from the nationalist side.
They defend Urban Naxals who plot against the state, but attack elected MPs like Nishikant Dubey for speaking the truth?
Is dissent only valid when it comes from the Left?
Does the Constitution only apply to activists and not to nationalists?
Supreme Court – God’s New Embassy?
Today, some judges believe they are not interpreters of law—but messiahs of morality.
They believe they are above the people, above Parliament, above the Constitution.
They act like prophets, untouchable and unquestionable.
But when citizens start losing faith in the judiciary, that is the real constitutional crisis.
And that moment… is here.
Final Explosion – The Call to Rise
This is not about one judge or one lawyer.
This is about the soul of Bharat.
Should we allow a handful of elite lawyers and compromised judges to hijack democracy?
Or will the awakened youth of India rise and say—enough is enough?
Will we allow “Satyamev Jayate” to become “Jhootmev Jayate”?
Or will the nation roar once again:
“We the people” are supreme.
It’s time to reclaim our courts.
It’s time to demand transparency.
It’s time to end the Court of Convenience… and bring back the Temple of Justice.
Because justice is not a privilege for the few.
It is the right of every Indian.
Like. Share. Comment. And tell us…
Is the Indian judiciary still the last hope of justice—or has it become the first agent of manipulation?
This is not just a article.
This is your voice.